| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Horsburgh v NZ Meat Processors Industrial Union of Workers ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Horsburgh v NZ Meat Processors Industrial Union of Workers
Horsburgh v NZ Meat Processors Industrial Union of Workers CA102/86 () NZCA 75; () 1 NZLR 698; (1988) 2 NZELC 96,397; (1988) ERNZ Sel Cas 193 is a cited case in New Zealand law allowing (albeit through the backdoor) compensation for non financial loss, for example for distress. It effectively overruled Addis v Gramophone Co Ltd () AC 488 in NZ case law.
==Background==
Horsburgh was a member of the local meat workers union. In order to support its striking members at a nearby plant, the union required all its members to contribute to a $10 a week strike fund. Horsburgh refused to make these payments, resulting in his expulsion from the union, and due to compulsory unionism at the time, he then lost his job. It was later discovered that the strike levy was illegal to collect, due to it not being first subject to a secret ballot.
He sued the union for loss of income, as well as for the distress for losing his job.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Horsburgh v NZ Meat Processors Industrial Union of Workers」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|